Marry Me a Little

The plan Saturday was to see an early showing of Sex and the City: The Movie, a) because of my love/hate relationship with the series, seeing it that early would mitigate my chance of running into someone I knew, and b) ticket prices on weekends before noon at AMC theaters are half price; so win/win in terms of both my psyche and my wallet. As it turned out, the 11AM screening was sold out and I had to opt for the 12:10PM, meaning I paid full price. Yet! The sound was so shitty during the last ten minutes of the film (for some reason it dropped/bounced between speakers in a way that it was distracting) I ended up complaining to management and getting a free pass to any AMC. Well, that worked out.

Though I was loathe to mention my participation in the opening weekend of the S&TC estrogen apocalypse, at least publicly, I then remembered that given my past indiscretions I’m relatively shame-proof, so here I am blogging about it. The “it” being, ultimately, like consuming empty calories. But not even the fun, oh-what-the-hell kind. More akin to a 3AM Twinkie binge. Which is not to say that there weren’t funny moments in the film. The audience, comprised of straight gals and gay men –let’s not kid ourselves, there was no other demographic– laughed at the genuinely funny bits but seemed as equally bored/stamina-challenged by the sum total.

(Oh, and! A thought: Samantha Jones did not once get to indulge in her hedonistic sexual appetite: The cougar was neutered. One has to wonder if Cattrall’s character was stymied in retaliation for her negotiation tactics. Seriously, in the latter half of the movie she was the brunt of weight-gain jokes and then at one point they wheeled out a 50th birthday cake. Cast bickering or no, think of the fans. The gays and gals want to see Cattrall spread-eagle and orgasmic at least once in a 2 1/2 hour film, right?)

Regardless, it is no secret that the movie is centered on the expectations and realities of marriage. So it was either sheer coincidence, or subconcious manifestation of masochism, that I bookended the day with a Netfix’d viewing of the recent revival of the musical Company. Which is, to the uninitiated, also about marriage. Whoops! Ugh!

Though thirty-eight years apart in the writing, the muddled lives of urban marrieds and singles seems to remain an evergreen subject, when compared. In fact, Company, which revolves around thirty-five year old New York bachelor Bobby, could almost be seen as Mr. Big: The Musical. (And really, shouldn’t S&TC been made into a Broadway musical before a feature film? Given it’s audience demographic, well, the theatuh is more the refuge of gays and ladies than is the cinema during summer blockbuster time!) “Biggie Baby, Biggie Bubbie!”

Tellingly, what unites these works is that the matter of (heterosexual) matrimony is the provenance of two gay authors (Michael Patrick King for S&TC:TM and Stephen Sondheim for Company–granted he didn’t do the book, just music and lyrics. Still! Sensibilities! )

Interestingly, the marital issues espoused by Company still remain relevant and the “Sex” movie is drawing crazy crowds — there was a queue for the next screening when I exited the auditorium. The difference: onstage in the 70’s it was the middle-aged single male that was the subject of concern, now in the cinema of the aughts it’s the 40-year-old single gal. And as both pieces show, marriage is not a panacea to the troubles of single life. Though tellingly, even though dated, the theater piece was content to live in the realm of ambiguity, while once again Hollywood requires a neatly-tied bow. The ladies who lunch versus Carrie and her girlfriends who brunch.

One would be curious to ask Mr. Sondheim his thoughts about the differences in the pieces –seeing as he wasn’t interested in fairy tales until he wrote Into the Woods.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Movies and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Marry Me a Little

  1. Hmph. During all the hullabaloo about this movie coming out, I am only reminded of how you informed me it was my apathy towards this show that made me a bad person. Repeatedly. On Fire Island.

  2. ephemerist says:

    It wasn’t apathy. It was a viscious passing of judgment on a show you’d never watched. I was fighting on principle, not necessarily out of that much deference to the show. Also whiskey. I was fighting on whiskey.

  3. chasejoaquin says:

    I couldn’t help imagining Michael Patrick King winking playfully at the audience by naming Charlotte’s baby Rose (after Rose in The Golden Girls, easily Charlotte’s alter-ego post-menopause). And probably Samantha’s going through a temporary dry spell before she becomes Cougar Emeritus and resurface as Blanche. Myself I’m going through a dry spell, or not really because I’m doing out of choice for the summer. After getting hyped up about SATC, I’ve decided to not have sex at all for 100 days…and blogging about it LOL.

  4. ephemerist says:

    That’s an interesting analysis and one that escaped my purview, though I am an avowed GG fan. So, you’re blogging about abstinence through the summer, huh. Um, where? Link please. (Though I could certainly fill my own self-imposed blog quota with stories about not having sex…and that’s by twist of fate and not even choice. Sigh.)

  5. Pingback: le roncier » Time is of the essence

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s